Henry-Dale Goltz and

Evangelina Goltz

USPO Box 690126

San Antonio, Texas

Phone: 210-269-6279

 

Lodgment

In the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

 

Henry-Dale Goltz                                                         |

            And                                                                  |

Evangelina Goltz                                                           |

                        PETITIONERS                                    |

                                                                                    |

Against                                                             |           CIVIL NO. SA-06-CA-0768-XR

                                                                                    |

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,                            |

ET AL                                                                          |

                        DEFENDANTS                                   |

 

PETITIONERS’ RESPONSE TO

UNITED STATES” MOTION TO DISMISS

 

            The Petitioners file this RESPONSE to defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, dated 10 October 2006.  Defendants claim that this action must be dismissed by the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT “for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”  On August 30, 2006, this action was originally filed by Petitioners in Texas State Court.  That is where jurisdiction lies, and where relief can be granted.  It was for those reasons that this action was originally filed in Texas State Court and not in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.          It is now quite apparent that defendants’ Removal action from Texas State Court to UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, which court they now freely admit has no jurisdiction, was knowingly, and fraudulently designed and carried out to obstruct justice and block the due process / course of law.  Defendants are representatives and/or agents of the United States of America, and as such they hold an Office of Public Trust under Oath.  Their behavior in this matter is reprehensible, a violation of their Oaths of Office, and worthy of sanctions by the United States of America and this honorable court.

CONCLUSION

            For the foregoing reasons, the Petitioners renew their Motion to Remand this Action back to Texas State Court from whence it was deceptively Removed by defendants, and further Request this honorable court to attach appropriate sanctions upon the Defendants and agents in the Dept. of Justice for delay, deception, Obstruction of Justice, and interference with the due process / course of law.

 

           

We declare, under penalty of perjury, that the forgoing statement is true and correct,

So Help Us, God.

 

 

Affirmed by: _________________________              Affirmed by: _______________________________

                        Henry-Dale Goltz                                                         Evangelina Goltz

 

Executed on: _________________________              Executed on: _______________________________

 

 

 

 

Certification

This document has been mailed first class via USPS to the following:

 

Michelle C. Johns

Attorney, Tax Division

Department of Justice

717 N. Harwood, Suite 400

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-880-9762

 

 

Date                                                    

 

                                                           

              Signature